Computer Software to Catch the Corrupt in China

With corruption among official ranks emerging as a major menace, a Chinese provincial government has introduced a computer software which continuously monitor the work of officials.

In the Nanjing Urban Planning Bureau of Jiangsu Province, a yellow light will flicker in the office computer system of the department, a warning signal, if an official does not finish a case within 20 days.

“If an official violates the protocol when dealing with a case, a red light will flicker,” Ding Haiyang, head of the discipline department of the bureau told official Xinhua newsagency.

The system enables public to follow their case, know the result of the official’s work on a website and make complaints online, Ding said. “Since the system was installed, every official has tried his best to finish his part of his work in time and hand it to colleagues in the next step.

No one wants to be the one who delays the case and causes the yellow light to flicker,” Ding said, adding that the discipline department will monitor the work of all officials through the system.

The new system is proving effective as 52 departments of the provincial government, 13 city governments and 106 county departments in Jiangsu are linked by the new monitoring system.

According to the provincial discipline agency, the system has sent about 3,200 yellow-light warnings and 22,400 red-light warnings throughout the province since it started operation in January last year.

“Transparency of government work and effective supervision are the best way to prevent corruption. The new system helps us supervise the administrative power and stem graft at its source,” Xie Chang, deputy secretary of provincial commission for discipline inspection said.

The new system is one of many measures the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CPC) is publicising as a part of its efforts to show that fighting corruption is its major priority as it continued unabated despite cases where some high profile officials have been given death sentences.

According to new figures, recent commercial bribes alone amounted to a whopping 16.59 billion Yuan (USD 2.65 billion) during the past five years. Prosecutors at all levels investigated more than 240,000 cases of embezzlement, bribery, dereliction of duty, and rights infringement.

Source : The Indian Express

Excellant, i am forwarding this to all my contacts,
all your posts are moving us forward, please keep it up

What possible things can corrupt the MBR?‎
....................
plc training in chennai

Attached Images

imagenregistro.jpg (11.5 , 0 views)

__________________

wonderful solution. We should be replicated the same method duly customised to our's system. Great you are sourced the article from Indian express newspaper and posted on this forum.


This is nagesh from hyderabad. If you are from hyderabad and organise any activities in this regard, please inform me.

Thank you.

Hi,Thanks, im from coimbatore, working and residing now in Egypt, lets all be more active through this tool and wait for a right chance to do something,
For now just ask your friends and relatives to join with us,

I like this solution...
Their should be track of each and every thing so they work properly and do their daily job for which they are paid....
I think everyone should come up with different ideas like this , which one day can be suggested , approved by people and implemented .

Prime minister Manmohan singh is not fit, not honest, not intelligent, not ethicle and not wise enough to work at the post of PM, see reason as follows
For selection of CVC, a three member high-level committee selects & appoints CVC from a panel of 3 names forwarded by Dopt secretary.
The 3 member high-level committee included PM, leader of opposition in loksabha & homeminister.
The theme behind the procedure is so that wisdom of three can reach to best selection of CVC.
but this MMS PM and Homeminister made it again like division of vote. if they would have used thier majority to select a better option that it would have been justified but they used their majority with bad intentions.
Here as the member of high-level committee they should have used their good wisdom to put forward the best choice, but their wisdom was to select a tainted person, so it proves PM Mabnmohan singh and chidambaram both are not good at wisdom.
2. the third member the leader of opposition Sushma used her good wisdom to reach to a conclusion that out of the 3 choices mr PJThomas was not fit for the post, she conveyed her wisdom to Prime minister and chidambaram but again they wishfully avoided to heed to the wisdom of Sushma ji. It means 2 of 3 members of a high level committee were not wise enough to reach to a good selection, leave their inability aside, they were not even ready to learn from others wisdom, so this is a criminal effort to reach to a wrong selection.
This shameless person Manmohan singh instead of accepting this, started attacking on Advani saying he has not forgiven him.
Manmohan singh has at several occasions defended A RAJA,not only he defended but he said, ARAJA has not done anything wrong, now ARaja is in Jail and based upon the avilable information CAG was able to reach to a conclusion that ARaja has done something serously wrong which has caused a presumptive loss of 1.76lakh crores.
The question is if CAG can reach to this conclusion, then why Mr Primeminister Manmohan singh was able to reach toa different conclusion that ARajaj has not done anything wrong, while he was privy of more information and much before than the CAG has. It proves he has deliberately tried to mislead parliament at several occasions. it could be becuase of two reasons, either Manmohan singh is not competent enough to understand, that a person from his cabinet is crrupt and causing a huge loss to exchequer, or he knew everything but kept quite and even defended the corrupt again he could have done this for 2 reasons, 1.he is in collusion with ARaja and has enjoyed the fruit of corruption directly by taking share, or he kept quite so that his masters (Gandhi family) can get their share of the money.
This the good reason he is not fit, not honest, not intelligent, not ethicle and not wise enough to work at the post of PM