Anna vs Arvind: 4 reasons why the rock star lost to his manager
by Lakshmi Chaudhry Nov 6, 2012

Should Kejriwal follow Anna's 'take it easy' policy?
Kejriwal not greedy, but not above being lured by power: Anna
Anna to announce brand new IAC panel by 10 November

He came, he saw, he was ignored. Thus is the story of Anna Hazare’s press conference which attracted a couple of cameramen and a handful of reporters. The damp-squib atmosphere offered a stark contrast to previous media outings, including his last sojourn to Delhi, which have typically been crowded and chaotic, reflecting the fever-pitch interest in all things Hazare.

Standing alone and mostly ignored, the man from Raleghan Siddhi looks like a has-been, the losing partner of the sensational split with Arvind Kejriwal.

During the Lokpal movement, popular consensus was that it was Kejriwal who needed Hazare. The genial, beloved face defined the anti-corruption movement, and was essential to its success. Most expected Kejriwal, therefore, to splutter back into obscurity in the wake of the divorce, flailing without the star power of Hazare, Kiran Bedi et al to attract and hold the attention of the urban middle class, and therefore the media.

Conventional wisdom was wrong. Kejriwal has instead emerged from the ashes as powerful and relevant than ever, while Anna is reduced to holding barely attended pressers.

It is far too early to count out Hazare — or count in Kejriwal who is playing a high-risk media game — but there are important lessons here about the art of modern Indian politics.

Kejriwal has emerged from the ashes as powerful and relevant than ever, while Anna is reduced to holding barely attended pressers. PTI
One, it’s all about the media. No modern political movement, party, or leader can succeed without an effective media strategy. You have to figure out how to grab eyeballs and hold on to them. It may be dangerous to ride the tiger, but also mandatory. And no one knows that better than Kejriwal who was the brains behind the Lokpal movement’s most spectacular victories and losses. The first two fasts in Delhi were cinematic blockbusters, but they quickly lost their sheen. It took two big duds — one in Mumbai and the most recent in Delhi — for Kejriwal to finally get the message. But when he finally did so, Kejriwal pivoted quickly to the next big thing. His new modus operandi — sensational exposes of big names — is once again engineered to guarantee a media feeding frenzy.

Kejriwal’s key virtue is this: he may overdo, but he never stops doing.

In comparison, Anna is a media innocent, unwilling or unable to tailor his strategy to the demands of the media script. He may bask in the glow of the spotlight, but he does not know how to command it — nor does he have anyone by his side who can do it for him. A press conference to issue a vague statement about a new IAC panel — without naming names or an agenda — is not the kind of stuff that makes headlines or dominates the TV talk shows. The near-absence of coverage today is a measure of Anna‘s naivete in holding a media event without anything to say.

Two, relevance trumps personality. Before Kejriwal came along, Anna Hazare had been waging his own long battle against corruption with modest success. His Lokpal movement was the first to grab national attention because it was perfectly timed. One, it came in the wake of several spectacular corruption scandals, including 2G and Commonwealth Games. Two, the government had just gutted the first draft of the Lokpal bill. The two taken together offered a powerful indictment of a ruling party at a time when popular anger was rising to a boil. Kejriwal’s additional stroke of brilliance was to employ a mode of protest — i.e. the public fast — that took the UPA entirely by surprise.

Anna may have inspired the slogans, caps and t-shirts, but his ascendance to cult status would have been impossible without a political message that was carefully framed to tap into the here and now. Kejriwal’s greatest strength is that he is finely attuned to the pulse of his base, i.e the urban middle class.

The anti-establishment appeal of Lokpal finally sputtered out once it became mired in parliamentary process, and became part of political business as usual. The bill has now been usurped as a campaign promise for the ruling Congress party, with Rahul declaring, “We will get the (Lokpal) bill passed in Parliament soon. Wait and watch.” It’s why Kejriwal jumped the Lokpal bandwagon and moved on to the next incendiary strategy: naming and shaming. He chose each target to ensure immediate relevance, to articulate what was on the top of everyone’s mind. Robert Vadra to tap into the rage against the Gandhi brand of dynastic politics. Nitin Gadkari to cash in on the intensifying power struggle within the BJP. And Mukesh Ambani to capitalise on the rising ire of a middle class trapped by stagnant salaries and rising inflation even as the very rich continue to make hay.

The Lokpal war has been fought, and partly lost. The battlelines have already moved elsewhere. And all of Anna’s Gandhian charm will not keep him in the spotlight if he continues to fight yesterday’s battles.

,,,,,,,,,,,,continued in next article