View Single Post
  #1  
04-06-2011
rawatdinnu
Junior Member
 
: Apr 2011
: 45
:
: 6 | 0.00 Per Day
Angry PTA teachers in UTTARAKHAND got appointment against Supreme Courts Ruling for good BRIBE to depart

IN First Stage Secretary of Education, Uttarakhand Govt.issued an Govt. order no.54/xxiv-4/2009 Dated :03Feb.2009 for Regularizing to PTA teachers. In G.O. he directed to subordinate officials that “SUPREM COURT’s Ruling Dated.10-04-2006” in writ petition no.3595-3692/1999 of UmaDevi &others Vs State of Karnataka must be followed in appointing teachers by PTA teachers.
IN SECOND Stage Director of School Education : Uttarakhand on the basis of above G.O. issued letter no. ma/49975-89/2008-09 dated 18-02-2009 to All District Education Officers Uttarakhand that “SUPREM COURT’s Ruling Dated.10-04-2006must be followed point to point in this PTA teachers appointment. If otherwise they would be personally responsible for that.
IN THIRD Stage_District Education Officers(DEO) of all concerned District of Uttarakhand issued a letter to respective School’s Principal/Managers [where PTA teachers was appointed without any rule and regulation] that they must insure that “SUPREM COURT’s Ruling Dated.10-04-2006must be followed in this PTA teachers appointment. If otherwise they would be personally responsible.
NOW Principal/Managers of respective School’s took affidavit on 10 Rupee Stamp paper that- Such and such person is appointed by me on such and such post in the view of “SUPREM COURT’s Ruling & direction” ___AND that was the END of SUPREM COURTS JUSTIC for Youth.
Next …..with this affidavit and bribe approx. Rs. 1,50,000 they moved paper to their DEO for approval.In few cases officials have taken 4 to 5 lakh, And distributed job Of Teachers with the pay scale of regular teacher.The BRIBE amount was Distributed from Top to Bottom……